Banking

IPO Momentum Stalls in India Amid Weak Sentiment and Global Uncertainty

It was conveyed by investment bankers that at least two significant initial public offerings (IPOs), collectively valued at approximately $759 million, were expected to be delayed in India. This development was seen as part of a broader trend wherein an increasing number of Indian companies had reportedly decided to postpone their public listings due to weakening investor sentiment and uncertain macroeconomic conditions.

Among the companies whose IPOs had been put on hold were Avanse Financial Services, an education loan provider, and Anthem Biosciences, a prominent contract drug manufacturer. These entities were said to be joining a list that already included the Indian division of South Korean conglomerate LG Electronics. Industry professionals indicated that these postponements were reflective of growing caution in the capital markets, particularly in the context of geopolitical instability and ongoing global trade disputes.

According to banking insiders, institutional investor participation had remained selective and subdued. Suraj Krishnaswamy, who serves as managing director of investment banking at Axis Capital, was cited as having stated that only a limited number of institutional investors were currently active, owing in large part to prevailing global uncertainties. Additionally, tensions between India and Pakistan were also believed to have contributed to a less favorable environment for capital raising.

This shift in IPO plans was viewed as emblematic of a wider hesitation within corporate circles, where companies had begun reassessing their expansion and fundraising strategies amid a cloudy economic outlook. The geopolitical tensions, particularly those linked to U.S. trade policy under President Donald Trump, were thought to have had a dampening effect on investor confidence worldwide. As a result, several Indian firms that had previously received regulatory clearance for their IPOs were said to be re-evaluating their market timing.

One notable case that underscored the fragile state of investor appetite was that of electric scooter manufacturer Ather Energy. Its IPO, which had been anticipated to serve as a bellwether for renewed enthusiasm in India’s primary market, failed to deliver the expected optimism. Despite opening at a modest 2% premium to its issue price of ₹321 per share, the stock ultimately closed 5.8% lower by the end of the day. This performance was interpreted as a signal of continued investor skepticism, especially in sectors such as electric vehicles (EVs), where profitability remained uncertain and competitive pressures were intensifying.

Vinit Bolinjkar, head of research at Ventura Securities, was quoted as having observed that the lukewarm reception to Ather’s IPO reflected persistent concerns about the broader EV market, including challenges related to sustainability and financial viability. The listing, which had ended a two-month hiatus in mainboard IPOs, had been closely watched for signs of a market rebound. However, its underwhelming outcome reinforced the view that risk aversion among investors remained pronounced.

It was further noted that approximately 58 companies with regulatory approval from Indian authorities had not yet moved forward with their IPOs. These delays were attributed largely to disruptions in the global financial landscape, which were perceived to have been intensified by the tariff measures introduced by the United States. The resultant slowdown in economic activity and fears of an impending global recession had reportedly led many corporate issuers to shelve or defer their public offerings.

Avanse Financial Services had reportedly secured the necessary approvals for its \$356 million IPO in October 2024, while Anthem Biosciences had been given clearance to raise \$403 million as recently as April 3. However, both firms had declined to provide comments when approached regarding their revised IPO plans.

Market analysts and investment advisors believed that unless macroeconomic conditions improved significantly, further delays in IPO activity could be expected. The combination of geopolitical risks, investor caution, and lackluster market performance was considered detrimental to new listings, especially for companies in sectors viewed as high-risk or requiring long-term capital commitments.

In light of these developments, it was being widely anticipated that companies would adopt a more measured approach to capital market entry, with some possibly exploring alternative fundraising methods or waiting for more stable conditions. Until investor sentiment showed clearer signs of recovery, India’s primary market was likely to remain subdued, with many issuers continuing to adopt a wait-and-watch strategy.

Banking

Strategic Plan Demanded as Bank of America Seeks to Close Performance Gap with Key Rivals

Pressure is currently being faced by the executive leadership of the second-largest U.S. lending institution, as intense focus is being placed upon the need to significantly boost financial returns through strategic actions in areas such as dealmaking and wealth management. These actions are considered vital if the bank is to successfully reduce the considerable performance gap that has developed between itself and its larger industry rival. A major gathering of investors is scheduled to be convened in Boston on November 5th by the Chief Executive Officer, who has held the leadership role since 2010. During this event, a detailed strategy is expected to be formally outlined, specifying how the institution plans to achieve meaningful growth after its returns have been consistently observed to trail those of its peer group. The convening of this meeting is particularly noteworthy, as it represents the first comprehensive investor engagement of this nature to be held by the bank since 2011.

It has been suggested by informed investors that the upcoming presentation could be strategically utilized by the bank to underscore its competitive advantages in certain operational segments, particularly those pertaining to its strength in the consumer and small business lending markets. Despite these established strengths, shareholder scrutiny remains intently focused on the divisions where the bank’s performance has been found to be lacking in comparison to market leaders. Specifically, the investment banking division is widely considered to be engaging in a determined effort to close the gap in key dealmaking revenue, where it remains behind the output of major competitors. Similarly, the institution’s wealth management arm is responsible for managing fewer client assets when compared not only to the largest rival but also to a smaller, specialized competitor in that field. Consequently, the methods by which the leadership team intends to strategically close these significant market deficits in the coming years are being rigorously assessed and are expected to form a central pillar of the strategy presentation.

The institution’s performance over the last decade and a half has been subjected to pointed and highly critical analysis by prominent banking analysts. It was asserted that a “remarkable” degree of underperformance by the bank, relative to the wider industry, has been documented over the past fifteen years concerning the critical metric of loan growth. It was further observed that similar patterns of lagging performance have been noted in several other key segments, specifically including certain areas of wealth management, core investment banking activities, and credit card services. These historical deficiencies establish the challenging context against which the new growth strategy must be evaluated by the investment community. No immediate comment regarding these observations was provided by the institution.

The foundation for the current strategic focus was laid following the severe instability generated by the 2008 financial crisis, a period during which the stability of the global economic system was acutely threatened. The current leadership assumed its role shortly thereafter. Following the crisis, a challenging period was endured, during which the purchased investment bank, Merrill Lynch, which had been bought at the point of collapse, was systematically integrated into the broader structure. Crucial early actions involved the successful repayment of government bailout funds and the implementation of significant and extensive job reductions. After what was acknowledged to be a difficult initiation, a momentous organizational turnaround was successfully engineered. This reconstruction effort was consistently guided by an oft-repeated corporate mantra emphasizing “responsible growth.” The successful, multi-year rebuild that followed secured the Chief Executive a global reputation as a steady and reliable operator, leading to regular appearances on prominent international stages alongside world leaders.

Now that the financial stability of the core institution has been restored and fortified, the investment community’s attention has shifted decisively toward future profitability and the next phase of expansion. The critical question being posed by shareholders, including those represented by senior equities analysts, relates to how greater returns can be extracted from the substantial capital investments that have been made in the overall banking infrastructure over the preceding years. It is being questioned how the leadership team will translate the stability achieved through “responsible growth” into superior earnings performance that can finally meet or exceed the metrics consistently delivered by the bank’s most successful domestic rivals. The upcoming investor meeting is therefore recognized as a high-stakes event where a clear, well-defined, and implementable roadmap for achieving higher levels of sustainable profitability is urgently expected to be presented and convincingly defended. The necessity of generating high returns through the lucrative, fee-based business lines of dealmaking and asset management is considered paramount if the performance gap is to be successfully closed.

Continue Reading

Banking

Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank – Egypt Wins Prestigious “Best Islamic Bank Egypt 2025” and “Best Islamic Sustainable Bank Egypt 2025” Awards at World Business Achievers Awards 2025

Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank – Egypt (ADIB Egypt) is proud to announce that it has been honoured with two distinguished awards at the globally recognised World Business Achievers Awards 2025: Best Islamic Bank Egypt 2025 and Best Islamic Sustainable Bank Egypt 2025. These accolades underscore the bank’s steadfast commitment to Sharia-compliant banking excellence and sustainable finance leadership in Egypt.

Key highlights of the awards:

  • Best Islamic Bank Egypt 2025: This award recognises ADIB Egypt’s outstanding performance in conventional and Islamic finance across retail, corporate and investment banking, highlighting its innovative solutions, customer-centric service and market leadership.
  • Best Islamic Sustainable Bank Egypt 2025: This additional honour acknowledges the bank’s pioneering role in integrating sustainability into its Islamic banking operations — including green financing, responsible investment and strong ESG (environmental, social and governance) practices.

About Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank – Egypt

Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank – Egypt (ADIB Egypt) is part of the Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank Group, one of the region’s most respected financial institutions. The bank offers a comprehensive range of Sharia-compliant products and services across retail, corporate, investment, and SME segments. With a strong focus on innovation, ethics, and social responsibility, ADIB Egypt continues to drive positive change in the Egyptian financial landscape.

About the World Business Achievers Awards

The World Business Achievers Awards celebrates excellence in global business leadership, innovation, and sustainable performance. Each year, leading organisations and executives are recognised for their contributions to shaping a more responsible and forward-thinking business world.

Continue Reading

Banking

U.S. Banks Turn to Fed for Short-Term Funding

A recent development in the U.S. financial system has been observed, with it being reported that U.S. banks borrowed $1.5 billion from the Federal Reserve’s Standing Repo Facility (SRF) on a Monday. This particular day was noted to be the deadline for quarterly corporate tax payments and Treasury debt settlements. The borrowing, as shown by Fed data, has been seen as an indication of some tightness in the financial system in meeting its funding obligations. The SRF was established to serve as a backstop for any potential funding shortages. Launched in July 2021 in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed’s SRF provides daily overnight cash, in two separate sessions, in exchange for eligible collateral such as U.S. Treasuries.

Analysts have noted that the corporate tax payment date coincides with a large settlement of Treasury securities for recently issued debt. Data from a money market research firm, Wrightson ICAP, indicated that approximately $78 billion in payments were due to the U.S. Treasury on that Monday as well. It has been suggested that these settlements, along with the corporate tax payments, were expected to push the U.S. Treasury’s cash balance to a figure exceeding $870 billion. The borrowing from the SRF was recorded as $1.5 billion in cash during the morning session, with no further borrowings occurring in the afternoon.

This recent borrowing is not the largest that has been seen. On June 30, financial institutions had borrowed about $11.1 billion from the SRF, a transaction that was backed primarily by Treasuries as collateral. This was reported as the largest borrowing from the facility since its inception four years ago. The current utilization, however, has been described as small and in line with expectations. A U.S. rates strategist at Deutsche Bank, Steven Zeng, noted that the small utilization suggests that elevated repo levels may be providing an opportunity for some banks or dealers to make a return by sourcing funds from the Fed and then lending them out.

It was also explained that cash was tight on that day because money market funds had less excess to lend. This was attributed to the fact that they have been allocating a greater portion of their funds to T-bills. Additionally, it was noted that these funds were either losing or holding back cash for redemptions in anticipation of the corporate tax payment date.

Ahead of these significant payments, rates in the repurchase (repo) market, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), had risen above the interest rate paid on bank reserves. SOFR, which represents the cost of borrowing cash overnight with Treasuries as collateral, rose to 4.42% last Friday, a level that matched the high of 4.42% that was hit on September 5 and was the highest in two months. In contrast, the Interest on Reserve Balances (IORB) is currently at 4.40%.

The relationship between SOFR and IORB is significant. It is expected that SOFR should trade at or below IORB because banks have the option of parking their money at the Fed in a risk-free manner to earn IORB. However, when SOFR rises above IORB, it is seen as an indication of an exceptional demand for secured funding against Treasuries. This phenomenon typically occurs around the time of Treasury auction settlements. Teresa Ho, a managing director at JPMorgan, stated in a research note that while firmer SOFR levels were to be expected, the magnitude of the increase “somewhat caught us off guard.” She also noted that while the markets have largely been able to absorb the additional Treasury bill supply with ease, the reallocation of funds from the repo market to T-bills accelerated in August. This was attributed to money market funds aggressively extending their weighted average maturities, a move that was done in anticipation of potential Fed rate cuts. The current situation highlights the complex interplay between fiscal deadlines, monetary policy, and short-term funding markets.

Continue Reading

Trending